Current:Home > NewsAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -Summit Capital Strategies
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-12 00:50:31
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (3799)
Related
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- Brian Kelly offers idea for clearing up playoff bubble, but will CFP committee listen?
- Brian Kelly offers idea for clearing up playoff bubble, but will CFP committee listen?
- Hailey Bieber and Justin Bieber Step Out for Yummy Date Night After Welcoming Baby Jack
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- US Open Cup final: How to watch Los Angeles FC vs. Sporting Kansas City
- How Mike Tyson's training videos offer clues (and mystery) to Jake Paul bout
- Free COVID tests are back. Here’s how to order a test to your home
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Wisconsin district attorney pursuing investigation into mayor’s removal of absentee ballot drop box
Ranking
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Buying or selling a home? Here are Tennessee's top real-estate firms
- Julie Chrisley's 7-year prison sentence upheld as she loses bid for reduced time
- NFL MVP race after Week 3: Bills' Josh Allen, Vikings' Sam Darnold lead way
- What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
- Who plays on Thursday Night Football? Breaking down Week 4 matchup
- Pregnant Brittany Mahomes Shares “Best Picture” Ever Taken of Husband Patrick and Son Bronze
- Appeals court sends back part of Dakota Access oil pipeline protester’s excessive force lawsuit
Recommendation
Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
Georgia court rejects counting presidential votes for Cornel West and Claudia De la Cruz
Harris makes scandal-plagued Republican the star of her campaign to win North Carolina
MLB blows up NL playoff race by postponing Mets vs. Braves series due to Hurricane Helene
'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
Parents will have to set aside some earnings for child influencers under new California laws
How much will Southwest Airlines change to boost profits? Some details are emerging
Roy Clay Sr., a Silicon Valley pioneer who knocked down racial barriers, dies at 95